Skip to main content

Looking at cybersecurity from the other side of the looking glass

 Understanding malware

As a software engineer, I have taken for granted I'd understand a lot of how malware works. But then I also know that the devil is in the details. This lead me to a YouTube series by @lauriewired (https://www.youtube.com/@lauriewired), who is a reverse engineer and takes apart malware in full view so that viewers understand process as well as tools.  She is thorough and methodical in her videos, which makes me self-conscious about the way I leapt off the trail when doing similar investigations and looked to see what was at the endpoints or URLs I found in code - without finishing to see conclusively what the goal of the malware was. I'd assume data exfiltration, without necessarily proving such and from watching @lauriewired, I see there are many variants and what I'd missed was seeing how the perpetrators were likely actually setting up to download an entire command and control piece to make a virtual slave out of the system.

Seeing malware de-obfuscated and refactored provided an in-depth view of malware from the authors point of view. It was interesting in that the code was not haphazard, but also built with a certain level of redirection that seemed to only add stack-frames to the execution, perhaps itself a level of runtime obfuscation.

Overall, I've found a number of @LaurieWired presentations informative and would recommend giving them a look. 

Labels:
Location: Boston, MA, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

You don't really know who you're talking to online...

The following is a story that I think highlights the assumptions that get you into trouble online... https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/i-knew-you-were-trouble-ta456-targets-defense-contractor-alluring-social-media This is particularly scary since we found so much utility in online connections during the pandemic and out of necessity, started trusting more online. Please note the timeline for this breach - it was a long, slow process, a key factor in many 'cons'. "Build trust" is a key first step, once someone has identified you as a party. You think...you're convinced you know who your talking to, but if you don't triangulate the identity with some non-online, ideally in-person information, you shouldn't trust. And even if you do get what seems like real-life confirmations of identity, you must look at questioning motives, needs, and keeping danger at arms-length. Online includes email, texting (sms), application chatbots, voice communicati...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat Modeling Manifesto

Secure Your Code with Threat Modeling As a software developer, security should be a top priority. By proactively identifying and addressing potential vulnerabilities, you can significantly reduce the risk of breaches and data loss. What is Threat Modeling?   Threat modeling is a systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and mitigating security threats. It involves looking at your system from a hacker's perspective to uncover weaknesses and devise strategies to protect against attacks. See the  OWASP Cheat Sheet   Why is Threat Modeling Important? Proactive Security: By anticipating potential threats, you can take steps to prevent them. Risk Mitigation: Identify and address vulnerabilities before they can be exploited. Regulatory Compliance: Adhere to industry standards and regulations. Enhanced Security Posture: Strengthen your overall security posture. How to Get Started with Threat Modeling   The Threat Modeling Manifesto provides a valuable framewor...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where threat modeling can shine - an example from the EU MDCG-2019

From the  EU  MDCG 2019-16 Guidance on Cybersecurity for medical devices, December 2019 , this is the guidance on foreseeable risks.  Medical device manufacturers should ensure that a medical device is designed and manufactured in a way that ensures that the risks associated with reasonably foreseeable environmental conditions are removed or minimised. This may include the infield monitoring of the software’s vulnerabilities and the possibility to perform a device update (outside the context of a field safety corrective action) through, for example delivering patches to ensure the continued security of the device. During the risk management process, the manufacturer should foresee or evaluate the potential exploitation of those vulnerabilities that may be a result of reasonably foreseeable misuse. This, however, may depend on the specific situation. For example, using an unsecured memory-stick to enter data into a medical IT system can be considered “reasonably foreseeabl...
Post a Comment
Read more